Re: about two-way pipes or threads
- From: Paul Davis <pbd Op Net>
- To: Ronald Bultje <rbultje ronald bitfreak net>
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: about two-way pipes or threads
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:18:50 -0500
In message <20010210152217 C2939 tux bitfreak net>you write:
>Hi there,
>
>I have tried a few things to do what I want. I already asked some questions
>on threading, on creating/using pipes, but I just cannot figure it out.
>
>What I want is to have control over another application. I need to write
>data to it's stdin and read it's stdout. I figured that using the "lower
>level pipes" would be nice here, but they don't work a bit. I get all kind
>of weird errors, output is only grabbed after the application has quitted.
>It is probably necessary to flush this applications output and/or flush my
>own grabbing of that output, but anyway, it didn't work (yet). Also, in
>some cases, I get xlib-async errors.
Given that I have at least 3 of my own applications and can name at
least half a dozen others that use this approach, I can safely say
that the only thing with whatever you're doing is is probably a
trivial error. This approach works perfectly, and any errors you are
getting are caused by some lac of understanding.
Why don't you send us a suitably stripped down version of the code,
and someone (me, or someone else) can comment on it.
>Internet says that xlib-async errors means that xlib is not thread-safe. So
>is it safe at all to use threads when I get this error as a result?
You won't get this error if you bracket all calls to X/GDK/GTK with
gdk_threads_enter();
...
gdk_threads_leave();
as the FAQ instructs.
--p
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]