Re: GtkTreeView
- From: Joshua N Pritikin <vishnu pobox com>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Gtk+ MList <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GtkTreeView
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:06:45 +0530
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:50:20AM +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2001, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> > > hm, jonathan, was there actually any pressing need to not let
> > > column numbering start out at 1?
> >
> > Beyond the fact we're writing our code in C and not pascal?
>
> well, we're using >0 for quite a couple of id types, GQuark,
> source/handler/signal ids, though those are not as index-alike...
> it would just have been nice to preserve the 0-termination for
> varargs, and it would have made tree paths nicer - i guess. ;)
You're comparing apples and oranges. A GQuark of zero means "unset."
This is useful. Same for source/handler/signal ids. The zeroth column
offers what useful symmantic meaning?
--
Get self-realization at <http://sahajayoga.org> ... <http://why-compete.org> ?
Victory to the Divine Mother!!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]