RE: [gtk-list] Re: gtk_init_no_x ??

["Olivier Nenert" <onenert condumex com mx>]

thank's again... maybe I should have had a deeper look
at gtk_init_no_check to see what it was doing :)
(I thought it was doing much more, and it does, but I was thinking it could
be important
for my needs)
I just tried it
if(!gtk_init_check(argc, argv))
{
      gtk_type_init();
      gtk_signal_init();
}
and it worked just fine !  *bow bow* :)

Regards,

Olivier.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
Para: Olivier Nenert <onenert@condumex.com.mx>
CC: gtk-list@redhat.com <gtk-list@redhat.com>
Fecha: Viernes, 21 de Enero de 2000 11:05 a.m.
Asunto: [gtk-list] Re: gtk_init_no_x ??


>
>"Olivier Nenert" <onenert@condumex.com.mx> writes:
>
>> Hi... i was wondering if there is a plan, or at least if there is
factibility
>> of a gtk_init_no_x (or something like that).
>
>The way you do this is:
>
> gtk_type_init();
> gtk_signal_init();
>
>There are some eventual plans to move the type system into a separate
>library, but that won't happen soon. (Look at the gtk-devel-list archives
>for December at http://www.gnome.org/mailing-lists/.)
>
>Regards,
>                                               Owen
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null