Re: [gtk-list] A Super Text Widget Thingy
- From: pbg1854 garnet acns fsu edu
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] A Super Text Widget Thingy
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 00:54:09 -0500
I agree, XEmacs is a great program, but if it is easy to convert into
a GTK+ widget, I think it would be a great alternative to the GtkText
widget, especially considering that the widget is going to be
rewritten anyways. If it can be done as a patch to XEmacs, they might
not mind including it with the package.
Pete
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:56:17PM -0500, Matt Gushee wrote:
> Well, there are probably others who have greater knowledge on this
> issue, but as a devoted fan of XEmacs (or any Emacs, really), I feel I
> have to say something about this:
>
> pbg1854@garnet.acns.fsu.edu writes:
>
> > I was thinking about XEmacs, and how it allows you to embed it as a
> > widget inside your program, and I thought it would be really cool if
> > GNOME/GTK+ had its own XEmacs type text editor widget that was
> > completely scriptable, and acted completely consistently across
> > apps.
>
> Yes, it would be cool. But do you have any idea how much work has gone
> into (X)Emacs? Some of the best minds in the free software world (RMS,
> Jamie Zawinski ... just for starters) have worked very, very hard for
> years to make it what it is.
>
> > library. I know we could probably hack XEmacs to work with GTK+, but
> > it would probably be best to write one from scratch, to make it
> > seamlessly join in with the rest of GTK+ and GNOME.
>
> I don't believe it's a matter of hacking anything, really. I'm not too
> familiar with the internals of XEmacs, but AFAIK the heart of the
> XEmacs code base is very independent of GUI toolkits, and it
> already supports several alternative widget sets.
>
> > Has anyone thought
> > about doing something like this before? I think it would be really
> > cool, and would be a great contribution to the GNOME project.
>
> Perhaps. But what kind of contribution would it be to the Emacs
> project? There are already two major Emacs development teams (FSF and
> XEmacs, of course), and it's my understanding that nobody on either
> team is very pleased that they can't manage to work together.
>
> I hate to dampen your enthusiasm. As I said above, I agree it's a cool
> idea. If only all cool ideas were good ones ...
>
> Matt Gushee
> Portland, Maine, USA
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]