RE: [gtk-list] Re: Image Libraries
- From: "Timothy M. Shead" <tshead k-3d com>
- To: <gtk-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: [gtk-list] Re: Image Libraries
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:11:04 -0800
My concern with gdk-pixbuf is that it seems to wrap libart, which is
drawing-oriented. It may make sense to use its' interface as a starting
point, however. On that note, we should probably take this off the list ...
anyone who's interested in this topic is welcome to drop me a line directly.
Timothy M. Shead
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David N. Welton [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 6:54 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [gtk-list] Re: Image Libraries
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 06:40:26PM -0800, Timothy M. Shead wrote:
> > Would anyone else be interested in such an animal? Nothing else
> > seems to fit the bill, and I'd be willing to take it on, if it'll
> > get used ...
> I'm interested in it! I might be able to contribute a bit, but
> whether that is helpful or a liability is probably up for debate;-)
> gdk-pixbuf seems to have a good base of code, why not work from there?
> I'm not sure it makes sense to rewrite all the image libs, at least
> not at first. My vague thought was to create some kind of
> struct... maybe use unions... to attach extra data to images.
> I have a patch for gdk-pixbuf that adds a save capability for jpegs.
> David N. Welton, Developer, Linuxcare, Inc.
> 415.354.4878 x241 tel, 415.701.7457 fax
> email@example.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/
> Linuxcare. At the center of Linux.
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe firstname.lastname@example.org <
] [Thread Prev