Re: [gtk-list] Re: Fortran



"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@is.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:

| Many of us might consider it ugly, but F90/95 should be up
| to the job.  At least it has dynamic memory allocation,
| records etc.

As there are no (that I know of) free (speech) F9x compilers, I guess
it is kinda limited who uses it in a capacity other than
scientific. But there might be somebody out there who will make
bindings towards F9x. 

But I still think it is a better idea to use a different language for
the interface and FORTRAN for the calculations.

-- 
Preben Randhol                 Affliction is enamoured of thy parts, 
[randhol@pvv.org]              And thou art wedded to calamity. 
[http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/]                    -- W. Shakespeare 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]