Re: [gtk-list] Re: gcc-2.8.1 (was Re: Unidentified subject!)




> Sorry that this is off-topic for this list, but I feel compelled to point
> out that this is not necessarily true. I have been using gcc-2.8.1 to
> compile the Linux kernel for the last 3 stable versions at least and have
> had no problems (other than more warnings than with previous versions).
> No idea about egcs though - you're probably right.

Not sure about gcc 2.8.1, but I can vouch for the fact that I've used egcs
to
compile my kernels for almost a year now and I have yet to produce a
non-bootable
kernel ... my box is as stable as it should be, so AFAIK, you don't have to
use gcc 2.7.2.x to compile your kernels ...

--> robert




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]