Re: GTK++ proposal
- From: Alan Shutko <ats acm org>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: GTK++ proposal
- Date: 26 Jan 1999 09:35:00 -0600
>>>>> "B" == Bill Huey <billh@mag.ucsd.edu> writes:
B> The flakiness of a compiler technology isn't really a good reason
B> to discount an *entire* design methodology.
C++ isn't a design methodology. It's a language. And compiler
flakiness is a very good reason to discount a language.
OO is a design methodology, and Gtk+ is OO.
B> My feeling is that if you're going to design GUI kit then you
B> should steal from the very best such as Apple's QuickDraw GX or
B> Display Postscript for various kinds of high quality document
B> handling and color management.
Good idea, and afaik there's a Gtk+ DPS widget (using GS's DPS) being
worked on. Color management is still a problem, since most of the
schemes are fairly proprietary, as I understand it. But Gtk+ should
definitely have all of the power in any other toolkit... patches are
accepted. 8^)
--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - By consent of the corrupted
Whoever would lie usefully should lie seldom.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]