"delete-text" and has_selection bug or feature?
- From: Andreas Leitner <leitner eiffel com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: "delete-text" and has_selection bug or feature?
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:06:24 -0700
Hi it`s me again,
I just found a wired behavior when manualy deleting (read: deleting text
at runtime - selection s.th. with the mouse and the pressing DEL) text
in a GtkText widget. I added an event handler to "delete-text" (tried
both before and after) and in the handler I print out the current
selection (selection_start_pos, selection_end_pos) together with
has_selection.
Now the strange thing is that has_selection gives me True while the
selection range is 0-0 which is IMO not a valid region and thus
has_selection should be False.
This causes me troubles because we are doing a GTK wrapper for Eiffel
here. In Eiffel you use a lot of assertions (special build in the
language assertions btw) and I would like to do a postcondition to
has_selection like "has_selection implies selection_start_pos /=
selection_end_pos".
Can anybody shed some light on this? Is this a bug on GTK or just
undocumented behavior or I don`t know?
I also had a look into the source code and it seems like the function
that is called is gtk_editable_delete_selection in there it is clear why
the behavior is like this:
----
start = editable->selection_start_pos;
end = editable->selection_end_pos;
editable->selection_start_pos = 0;
editable->selection_end_pos = 0;
if (start != end)
gtk_editable_delete_text (editable, MIN (start, end), MAX
(start,end));
if (editable->has_selection)
{
editable->has_selection = FALSE;
if (gdk_selection_owner_get (GDK_SELECTION_PRIMARY) == GTK_WIDGET
(editable)->window)
gtk_selection_owner_set (NULL, GDK_SELECTION_PRIMARY,
GDK_CURRENT_TIME);
}
----
Obviously the selected region and has_selection are not consitent while
gtk_editable_delete_text. Shouldn't this change to a well defined
behavior?
many thanks in advance,
Andreas
PS: I am using GTK and GLIB v 1.2.4
PS: Is this the right list to post such questions, or is there any
better?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]