Re: [gtk-list] Re: type system question

["CESAR MENA, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <CMENA bloomberg net>]

great!  makes much more sense now.  thanks.
---- Original Msg from: Tim Janik  <gtk-list@redhat.com> At:  4/29 14:39

On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, CESAR MENA, BLOOMBERG/  NEW YORK wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 

please don't send your message bodies in attachment, chances are
that it'll just get ignored if you do so.

<Quote>
hello all -

could anybody explain why is it necessary to call
LOOKUP_TYPE_NODE after gtk_type_class_init, if if was already
called??  if the variable 'node' was already pointing
to the right place in the type_nodes list, why would
calling gtk_type_class_init change that?? 
please excuse my ignorance if this is a ridiculous question,
but i don't see the point.
many thanks  
</Quote>

take a closer look at gtk_type_node_next_and_invalidate(), the
type nodes are kept in a relocatable array and therefore the
additional lookups are neccessary to maintain pointer validity.



---
ciaoTJ

-- 
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null