Re: [gtk-list] Re: C++ and gtk.

[pavel <pavel klebanov ne mediaone net>]

Fair enough. However, it seems illogical (even symantically incorrect) to
me that gtk_table_attach() takes a GtkAttachOption and not an int (just
like it used to be until recently).
Afterall, EXPAND|SHRINK is an int and not a GtkAttachOption. Besides,
while I don't know the particulars of compiler behavior, it seems quite
feasible to me that casting an int to a GtkAttachOption may result in a 1
or 2 or a 4 (i.e. a GtkAttachOption) and not, say, 5 as desired.

Any any case, what was the rationale behind changing an int to a
GtkOption?

Pavel

On 26 Apr 1999, Guillaume Laurent wrote:

> pavel <pavel@klebanov.ne.mediaone.net> writes:
> 
> > Is there a way to solve it without explicit casts (or writing my own
> > wrappers)?
> 
> Why writing your own C++ wrappers when there already are some...
> 
> -- 
> 					Guillaume.
> 					http://www.worldnet.fr/~glaurent
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
>