Re: [gtk-list] Re: I want to understand
- From: "D. Emilio Grimaldo Tunon" <emilio_tunon nl compuware com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: I want to understand
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:11:23 +0200
Jonathan Mark Brooks wrote:
> > 5) Just about any system has a decent C compiler ... the story is not quite
> > so simple for C++ where different compilers may implement a different
Personally I would rather program in C++ but considering the
"C-ness" of most things out there I usually opt for doing the
implementation in plain C. Yes, there are several C++ wrappers
but it isn't quite the same thing, there is no 'joint' effort
and less guarantees that it will not be discontinued at some
point while the main C code line still lives. These are of
course commercial decisions as well.
Then the other is that all/most systems do have a C compiler
but not all have a C++ compiler available because it costs
a lot more.
> I'm just glad that we have an alternative to Motif. Oh yeah,
> 7) WE NEED A GUI/RAD LIBRARY THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO LICENSE AT $150
> A POP!
>
Same here! did some Motif in the past and it was a nightmare,
not to mention that it wasn't freely available on Linux which was
more accesible to me as a developer. Also, if one gets tired of
spending lots of free time, girlfriend-time and weekends
developing things for free, and then decide to do a bit of
almost-commercial product on the side to subsidize your own
free-software development then it is also great one doesn't have
to shell out library royalties. I loved XForms but I stopped
developing with it because of the price tag on commercial
software:)
Cheers,
Emilio
--
D. Emilio Grimaldo Tunon Compuware Europe B.V. (Uniface Lab)
Software Engineer Amsterdam, The Netherlands
emilio_tunon@nl.compuware.com Tel. +31 (0)20 3126 516
*** The opinions expressed hereby are mine and not my employer's ***
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]