[gtk-list] Re: GTK and Qt comparison?
- From: Lokh <Patrice Fortier aquarel fr>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: [gtk-list] Re: GTK and Qt comparison?
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 12:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
> The GPL requires that all parts of the program (also shared libs) are
> under the GPL. The only exeption is the operating system clause. This
> is reason why the license of KDE is illegal.
Could you explain why the KDE license is illigal?
AFAIK KDE is a project, not a program. idem for Gnome.
>
> The LGPL does not require the same license for the whole program. That
> is the reason why most libraries are LGPL code. You can use LGPL code
> in which program you want. You can use it even in a proprietary
> program.
I don't see exactly what you meant, but it can be misunderstood.
You can use the library for any program you want. ie: you can
write a commercial program linked with an LGPL libarary.
If you _use_ LGPL _code_ in your program (ie: include this code in your
program), your code must be LGPLed.
> | I look at www.gnu.org but nothing really clear.
>
> You can ask rms@gnu.org
I guess the original poster can find a french translationof the GPL
at http://www.linux-france.com
Lokh.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]