Re: gamma warnings bug
- From: "K. Richard Pixley" <rich kyoto noir com>
- To: otaylor gtk org
- CC: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: gamma warnings bug
- Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 12:03:42 -0700
From: Owen Taylor <otaylor@gtk.org>
Date: 24 May 1998 10:47:59 -0400
To my understanding, parameter names in function prototypes are
basically ignored. So there is no way that:
void gtk_preview_set_gamma (double gamma);
Could shadow the global gamma() declaration.
Erm, well, technically it shadows, it's just rather immaterial since
the scope of the shadow is negligable.
I'm inclined say you should either drop the -Wshadow, or ignore the
warning. Generally, once you start adding warnings beyond -Wall,
you tend to get lots of warnings about things which aren't errors
at all.
Hmm... good point.
On the other hand, the name could be changed to _gamma, or gam, but
who knows if somebody would include a header file with functions by
those names? It seems like a bit of a lost cause.
We could drop the "gamma".
void gtk_preview_set_gamma (double);
--rich
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]