Re: [gtk-list] Re: Glade - UI Builder
- From: Rob Browning <rlb cs utexas edu>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Glade - UI Builder
- Date: 07 May 1998 21:07:09 -0500
"Daniel Solaz" <email@example.com> writes:
> Unneeded, no. Personal, yes. I can't think of anything more uniform and
> elegant. However, I need help from my editor (it highlights matching
> brackets on the fly) to code in Lisp.
> I know of a toolkit, formsVBT, that got much further: the whole widget
> tree, widget properties, and callback assignments were read at startup
> from a file, and it used a Lisp-style language with macros. Very
> powerful. Dead easy to parse.
Anybody else ever a little anguished by thinking about how much time's
been spent just trying to define and then write parsers for C++?
I heard that they just added another reserved word because they
discovered that the language as specified was (again?) unparsable
I often consider what might have happened if that energy had been put
into optimizing/improving/coding in more reasonable languages?
Spend your time doing something interesting. Most of the time that
doesn't mean writing parsers for yet another obtuse language.
Rob Browning <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
] [Thread Prev