Re: [gtk-list] Re: entry signals
- From: Steve Hosgood <iisteve iiweeble swan ac uk>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: entry signals
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 10:50:40 +0100
> "If we want to catch when the user has entered text, we can connect to
> the activate or changed signal.
> Activate is raised when the user hits the enter key within the Entry
> widget. Changed is raised when the text changes at all, e.g. for every
> character entered or removed".
>
Would it not be more logical for 'entry' to raise a "value-changed" signal
for when the user hits the enter key?
I can understand the idea of "activate" for (say) check-boxes or radio-
buttons, but not for this one. Is it not fair to think that "activate"
should be equivalent to a "value-changed(to TRUE)" signal?
--
Steve | Steve's law of House Rewiring:
S.Hosgood@swansea.ac.uk | "No matter how many power sockets
Phone: +44 1792 297292 + ask for Steve | you fit in a room, you will run
Fax: +44 1792 295811 | out within the first week of use
--------------------------------------------+ even if you took Steve's law of
http://iiit.swan.ac.uk/~iisteve/steve.html | House Rewiring into account"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]