Re: [gtk-list] Re: My experiences with GTK - what I would like changed...
- From: "GTK.Mailinglist.account" <gtk-ml fusebox hanse de>
- To: gtk-outgoing fusebox hanse de
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: My experiences with GTK - what I would like changed...
- Date: 02 Jun 1998 12:27:15 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com> writes:
> On 2 Jun 1998, GTK.Mailinglist.account wrote:
> > You can either click on it about 20 times or click on it, move the
> > mouse a bit and then you can select it. I have heard from amost
> > everyone else that they made the same experiences on their system (all
> > Linux systems with fvwm2).
> If you can provide a .fvwm2rc and detailed instructions for reproducing
> it, perhaps people will look into it...
Here is the "behaviour" setting part of my .fvwm2rc:
- -------------------
DeskTopSize 5x1
ClickTime 750
ColormapFocus FollowsFocus
OpaqueMoveSize 100
EdgeResistance 300 10
EdgeScroll 0 0
XORValue 1
WindowFont -b&h-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-180-*-*-p-*-iso8859-*
IconFont -b&h-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-140-*-*-p-*-iso8859-*
# fg bg null font
MenuStyle white grey15 grey20 -b&h-lucida-bold-r-normal-*-*-140-*-*-p-*-iso8859-* mwm
# active window colours fg bg
HilightColor white blue3
...
Style "*" Color white/blue4
Style "*" BorderWidth 6, HandleWidth 6
Style "*" StickyIcon, UsePPosition
Style "*" RandomPlacement, SmartPlacement
Style "*" MWMFunctions,MWMDecor,HintOverride
Style "*" DecorateTransient,IconBox -70 1 -1 -140
Style "*" Icon ques_ico.xpm, FocusFollowsMouse
- -----------------
If I can supply more data to get rid of this nasty flaw, please tell
me, I'd be glad to help.
> > implemented in the near future.
> The reasoning is Big BS. X is a networked display protocol, and since it
> runs over the network, everything is set up to be able to wait for the
> network to get the data there & back.
Well - I assumed the people writing those damn big intrinsics manuals
for X11 (and the xview toolkit) know more about it than I, so I
accepted it... but if I don't have to do it that way under GTK+: even
better ! :-)))
> > On the other hand: Has anyone made any experiences (positive or
> > negative) with using the handlers directly ? I'd ne kinda interested to
> > hear about it...
> Every gtk program that sets signal handlers does it directly. Just go do
> it and feel good about it :-)
Yes, ma ! :-))))))) Alright, I will try it... *smile*
Later,
Georg
- --
Georg C. F. Greve <greve@fusebox.hanse.de>
http://porter.desy.de/~greve/ - ICQ#10016966
"People who fight may lose. People who do not
fight have already lost." -- Bertolt Brecht
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed
iQCVAwUBNXPTg1ZXgZXDxqJtAQGpSAP+LIX7gnlnOtsEaNuxiwMAfDJCNOKTbIeN
6Vrvs/v114X76IRPKCZcXJ5SuCqIy4dKfxGQbV42bYkvdvrN/E9nmmhz7qIZvWdD
xieudhLid2M5aoVpqn8pD7VjgZ5FBYMD2Wah4C/FxsV3dr/cHY0ksgvy6nDuEOd2
euwW2NK4Ah4=
=U3Zu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]