Re: [gtk-list] Gtk & Qt
- From: Joel Becker <jlbec ocala cs miami edu>
- To: SEBASTIEN GAUTHIER <gauthier unix lancs ac uk>
- cc: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Gtk & Qt
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 19:48:09 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, SEBASTIEN GAUTHIER wrote:
> This is perhaps a newbie question but is I'd like to know the differences
> between the GTK and the Qt libraries.
The biggest difference is that GTK+ is C-based, while Qt is
C++-based. Both are very functional. Both look nice. Both are
supposedly well written (I know this of GTK+, but only have hearsay for
Qt).
The license argument that everyone has is really silly. GTK+ is
released under the GNU Public License (GPL), todays most common "free"
license. The non-commercial Qt is release under its own "Qt Free
License". This license says any code you write using Qt must either be GNU
Public Licensed, GNU Library Public Licensed, or a third GPL like
statement (it's shorter). What makes it different from the GPL is that
you cannot sell it and you CANNOT modify Qt. A GPL'd library can be
modified, as long as you provide everything that is necessary.
However, this is a moot point, cause you don't need to modify Qt
to change its functionality. It's C++. You just extend the classes :-)
There are more details, I am sure, but for the home user, using
only open-source software, the license usage of Qt and GTK+ are
effectively identical. I am using free software, writing free software,
and charging noone. Therefore I can use both legally.
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #232
"Keep your promises."
jlbec@ocala.cs.miami.edu
gr311@cleveland.freenet.edu
http://ocala.cs.miami.edu/~jlbec
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]