Re: [gtk-list] Re: objgtk vs. threads on RH 4.2
- From: dkrause gte net
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: objgtk vs. threads on RH 4.2
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 06:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
On 27 Apr, fractture wrote:
>>
>>
>> The problem is not so much that the errno definitions differ, but that errno in
>> libc5 under Linux is not thread safe. I.e. if one thread sets errno to
>> something, it will be set for all threads. Basically, if you want to do
>> threads, go for libc6. (As far as I know, though, switching libc is _not_
>> trivial. Go for a nice new distribution such as RH5. (Although that has other
>> problems.))
>
> If you have a PC, just wait for Stampede Linux ;)
>
What's Stampede?
--
=Don=
*****************************************************
"For millions of years, man lived just like the animals.
Then something happened which unleashed the power of our
imagination... We learned to talk"
Fight Spam! Join CAUCE (Coalition Against Unsolicited
Commercial Email) at http://www.cauce.org/ and tell
your Congresspeople how Spam mailings hurt you. Help
protect genuine Internet commerce: Outlaw UCE Spamming.
(This anti-Spam signature is available rent-free.
Inquire within :-) ) or this Support the anti-Spam
amendment Join at http://www.cauce.org/
*****************************************************
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]