Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk--: DOC++
- From: "Andrew V. Shuvalov" <andrew ecsl cs sunysb edu>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk--: DOC++
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:55:34 -0400
Hi!
> > > Because it failed to process a MacApp application I've to port to GNOME,
> > > (failed == endless loop/core dump)
> > > and the author of DOC++ didn't respond in 2 weeks or so :(
> >
> > And what is the state-of-the-art auto-documentation system?It's pity that
> > Sun's guys don't expand javadoc to c++.
> Why would you want to use a state of the art documentation system with
> a non state of the art language like C++?
> Seriously, I don't know. :) (But then, I don't touch C++ if I can avoid
> it.)
Oh, calm down, hot Estonian guys! Let's don't talk about c++ vs. something
else, i only wanna talk about autodocumentation systems, really.( BTW,
everything's sucks, except Smalltalk, and i say it absolutely seriously... )
>
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
--
Andrew
begin: vcard
fn: Andrew V. Shuvalov
n: Shuvalov;Andrew V.
org: SUNY at Stony Brook
adr: Computer Science dpt.;;SUNY at Stony Brook;Stony Brook;NY;11794;US
email;internet: andrew@ecsl.cs.sunysb.edu
x-mozilla-cpt: ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version: 2.1
end: vcard
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]