Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk--: DOC++

[Andreas Kostyrka <andreas rainbow studorg tuwien ac at>]

On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Andrew V. Shuvalov wrote:

> > > Hi Tero!
> > >    Why not to use DOC++
> > > http://www.zib.de/Visual/software/doc++/index.html
> > Because it failed to process a MacApp application I've to port to GNOME,
> > (failed == endless loop/core dump)
> > and the author of DOC++ didn't respond in 2 weeks or so :(
> 
> And what is the state-of-the-art auto-documentation system?It's pity that
> Sun's guys don't expand javadoc to c++.
Why would you want to use a state of the art documentation system with
a non state of the art language like C++?
Seriously, I don't know. :) (But then, I don't touch C++ if I can avoid
it.)

Andreas