Re: [gtk-list] as always: questions
- From: Christoph Hoegl <darkwing bsdd regensburg com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] as always: questions
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 14:56:31 -0700
Hi,
>
> In anticipation of 1.0....
>
> 1. Is it acceptable to separate plug-ins into a few files or is it
> (decidedly) better to put it all in one file...
>
Write it in as many files you think are suitable
write it with look for later inclusion into the gimp tree
(given you write the plug-in foo then place all files necessary
within ./foo/ (it eases the maintainers and the users job:-) )
> 2. How about supplying pixmaps with your plug-in. What's the final word:
> where do they go? (BTW, how do you introduce transparancy into an XPM?)
Make as view use as possible use of them place them within your
plug-ins/foo-dir (mention if you took it from another plug-in so the
plug-in maintainer is able to merge duplicates in another dir
within the plug-in tree)
>
>
> 4. What are the right libs to use in a Makefile: .so, .so.1, .so.1.0, or
> .so.1.0.0? I assume it's the first one....
>
Take the first it saves us reworking with newer versions
> Thanks...
>
> Pavel
>
regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Hoegl / darkwing@bsdd.regensburg.com / (Darkwing@berkeley.edu)
Siedlungsstr. 18 93128 Regenstauf Germany Fax:+49 940270611
12a Tellerrd. 93720 Berkeley CA USA Fax:+1 (510) 642 1043
=> OOOOOOOOOOOOOO = Now in the "TUNNEL IN NO TIME"-team = OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO =>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]