Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk+-971201
- From: Ben Gertzfield <che debian org>
- To: Jay Painter <jpaint serv net>
- Cc: Ben Gertzfield <che debian org>, Owen Taylor <owt1 cornell edu>, gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: gtk+-971201
- Date: 02 Dec 1997 16:46:41 -0800
>>>>> "Jay" == Jay Painter <email@example.com> writes:
Jay> Here's a guess: I made a change to gtk+/gtk's Makefile.am.
Jay> It had been hacked at some point so that the shared library
Jay> version was 1:0: now, I thought that libtool default blanks
Jay> to 0, but so I changed it back to read 1:0:0 I didn't mention
Jay> this because I thought it defaulted to 0, and therefore
Jay> libgtk.so.1.0.0, but maybe you have some libs which are
Jay> libgtk.so.1.0, which are not symbolic links, but are the
Jay> older gtk libs.
Odd. I don't use the make install part of gtk+ (libtool can't install
into relative directories, only absolute ones, for some bizarre reason
-- and Debian packages need make install PREFIX=debian/tmp) so I copy
the lib and make the symlinks all in my Debian packaging script.
so no, I haven't had any libgtk.so.1.0 on my system.
I'm currently compiling the most recent cvs version to see if it works
(I've been told it fixes the problem with text, but breaks something
Brought to you by the letters O and U and the number 3.
"We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of dreams." -- Willy Wonka
Ben Gertzfield <http://www.imsa.edu/~wilwonka/> Finger me for my public
PGP key. I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.
] [Thread Prev