Re: Automatic paragraph direction and BiDirection layouts in Gtk+
- From: Jonathan Ben Avraham <yba tkos co il>
- To: Ivrix Discussions <ivrix-discuss ivrix org il>
- Cc: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad cs toronto edu>, <gtk-i18n-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Automatic paragraph direction and BiDirection layouts in Gtk+
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:39:00 +0200 (IST)
Hi Dov,
Thanks for the URL of Behdad's write-up. Indeed it is a fine piece of
specification. BTW, I have joined the gtk-i18n-list, so I should see
Behdad's posts now.
If I understand the write up correctly, the inheritance of the "direction"
attribute allows us to override the Bidi algorithm and heuristic for the
"paragraph_direction" by setting the paragraph_direction to "strong". I
believe that this solves all of the Bidi problems that I currently forsee
in the Evolution Hebrew localization.
The next question is who implements Behdad's spec and when? Do you have
the time to do it? I am talking to two possible sponsors to get some
funding for this, BTW.
Regards,
- yba
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 dov imagic weizmann ac il wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Here it is:
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-i18n-list/2004-March/msg00001.html
>
> I'm very interested to hearing your comments on it.
>
> I am also very interested to hear your comments on my response on
> the subject "RFC on Evolution Localization Requirements". Did you
> get it?
>
> Regards,
> Dov
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> > Hi Dov,
> > Where can I see a copy of Behdad's write-up?
> >
> > - yba
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 dov imagic weizmann ac il wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Behdad,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your very clear write-up. It is as shame that this great
> > > summary was not available at the design stages of gtk+-2 as I think that
> > > a few mistakes may have been made that are not reversible.
> > >
> > > I'm still not ready to answer the question of how far gtk+ currently is
> > > from the view that you describe, but here are a few comments from reading
> > > your message and peaking at the gtk+ source code:
> > >
> > > * About "widget direction": gtk+ currently is employing a two layer scheme,
> > > called direction, and default direction. Both of these may take on the values
> > > LTR and RTL. The default direction is propagated, wheras the direction is not.
> > > This is not as good as what you proposed, but it may be good enough.
> > >
> > > * Align: gtk+ here uses a floating point value where 0 indicates
> > > align according to widget direction (which is determined by the contents), 0.5
> > > means center, and 1.0 means align in direction opposite to the layout direction.
> > > Here is the translation table between your description and gtk+'s:
> > >
> > > Behdad Gtk-xalign
> > > ------ ----------
> > > align 0
> > > align-opposite 1.0
> > > center 0.5
> > > inherit n/a
> > > opposite n/a
> > > left n/a
> > > right n/a
> > >
> > > The problem with the current gtk+ API is that since it was the choice
> > > of using a float instead of an enum, makes it very ugly to extend it and
> > > add the missing choices! The only way I see is to create floating point
> > > constants that are outside the 0.0-1.0 range.
> > >
> > > * Regarding "paragraph direction" - couldn't this be overloaded with the
> > > "widget direction". I'm not sure if you intend this to be a paragraph property
> > > or a widget property. As a widget property it seems that "the default widget
> > > paragraph direction" and the "widget direction" are close enough to be
> > > overloaded. As individual paragraphs I wonder why you chose "strong"
> > > instead of "rtl" and "ltr"? In any case gtk+ currently does not define this,
> > > and with the latest BiDi patch, the paragraph direction is always according
> > > to the resolved direction of the contents.
> > >
> > > I have a few ideas of what may be done, but I'd prefer to send this away
> > > as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Thanks again for your great summary.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dov
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il.
> > > To unsubscribe, please send mail to ivrix-discuss-request ivrix org il with
> > > only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe
> > >
> >
> > --
> > EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
> > =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
> > - yba tkos co il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
> >
> > ----
> > Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il.
> > To unsubscribe, please send mail to ivrix-discuss-request ivrix org il with
> > only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe
> ----
> Ivrix-discuss list. See http://ivrix.org.il.
> To unsubscribe, please send mail to ivrix-discuss-request ivrix org il with
> only the following line in the message body (NOT SUBJECT!): unsubscribe
>
--
EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- yba tkos co il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]