Re: postscript fonts vs. pango aliases
- From: "Adrian E. Feiguin" <afeiguin uci edu>
- To: Keith Packard <keithp keithp com>
- Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, gtk-i18n-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: postscript fonts vs. pango aliases
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:34:44 -0700
All right, I've done it, and I get ths right answer with fc-list.
However, my gtk program still shows the same problem, and does not find
the Demi font (or the Condensed fonts). Why is that?
Thank you!
<ADRIAN>
Keith Packard wrote:
Around 15 o'clock on Aug 23, Owen Taylor wrote:
Unfortunately it looks like the fontconfig parsing code doesn't
figure out that Demi is a form of bold. Since family/slant/weight
are the same you won't be able to select these fonts indepedently
in Pango.
That's a bug in an old version of fontconfig. Current CVS does:
URW Gothic L:style=Demi:slant=0:weight=180
URW Gothic L:style=Book:slant=0:weight=75
URW Gothic L:style=Demi Oblique:slant=110:weight=180
URW Gothic L:style=Book Oblique:slant=110:weight=75
This should do what you want.
-keith
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]