Re: gtk+/build/Makefile.in

[Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>]

At 11:45 08.02.02 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> It's a virtual module; virtual modules are a little funny sometimes.
>
>Actually, I now think it was a mistake to make it a virtual module
>included in glib, gtk+ and gimp. Sorry. My thoughts originally when
>making it a virtual module to be included in several places were that
>people might want to build gtk+ or gimp for Win32 without having the
>glib sources. 
>
>But I now think that surely those few people can be assumed to also
>have glib sources... Personally I don't need the build stuff any
>longer as I use autoconfiscation, but Hans, what do you think?
>
>I think it would be much simpler to just have build in glib as a
>"normal" subdirectory (and nowhere else). If this change wouldn't
>cause even more problems, feel free to do whatever manual CVS hacking
>needed to move build into glib as a normal directory.
>
Having the build directory exclusive in glib/build is fine with me.
I already adapted all the makefile.msc's to use it from only this
place (because I don't want to synchronize the always necessary 
local adaptions through gnome cvs :).

Regards,
	Hans

-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to 
get along without it.                -- Dilbert