Re: gtk+/build/

At 11:45 08.02.02 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> It's a virtual module; virtual modules are a little funny sometimes.
>Actually, I now think it was a mistake to make it a virtual module
>included in glib, gtk+ and gimp. Sorry. My thoughts originally when
>making it a virtual module to be included in several places were that
>people might want to build gtk+ or gimp for Win32 without having the
>glib sources. 
>But I now think that surely those few people can be assumed to also
>have glib sources... Personally I don't need the build stuff any
>longer as I use autoconfiscation, but Hans, what do you think?
>I think it would be much simpler to just have build in glib as a
>"normal" subdirectory (and nowhere else). If this change wouldn't
>cause even more problems, feel free to do whatever manual CVS hacking
>needed to move build into glib as a normal directory.
Having the build directory exclusive in glib/build is fine with me.
I already adapted all the makefile.msc's to use it from only this
place (because I don't want to synchronize the always necessary 
local adaptions through gnome cvs :).


-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to 
get along without it.                -- Dilbert

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]