Re: Makefile constructs
- From: Nicola Fontana <ntd entidi it>
- To: Stefan Kost <ensonic hora-obscura de>
- Cc: gtk-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Makefile constructs
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:21:11 +0100
Il giorno Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:49:05 +0200
Stefan Kost <ensonic hora-obscura de> ha scritto:
> The second bugreport has a suggestion, but that changes the pattern
> used in the gtk-doc.make makefile snippets. It is using:
>
> #### step1 ####
>
> step1-build.stamp: dependency1 dependency2 ...
> @echo 'gtk-doc: Building step1'
> <rules>
> @touch step1-build.stamp
>
> step1.stamp: step1-build.stamp
> @true
>
> #### step2 ####
>
> step2-build.stamp: step1.stamp dependency1 dependency2 ...
> @echo 'gtk-doc: Building step2'
> ...
>
> Can anyone tell we why this is always using *two* stamps and not just
>
> #### step1 ####
>
> step1.stamp: dependency1 dependency2 ...
> @echo 'gtk-doc: Building step1'
> <rules>
> @touch step1.stamp
Taking the sgml target as example, `sgml-build.stamp' is a classic
stamp file while `sgml.stamp' is created by gtkdoc-mkdb. This is
confirmed by a test: after touching the -section.txt file the docs
are not rebuilt, only the coverage report is shown.
My guess is gtkdoc-mkdb checks if a template has been modified, so you
don't need to track every .tmpl file in your makefiles. Removing the
template baggage should make this double stamp obsolete.
--
Nicola
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]