Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Do we trust this code or not? If not, we should either a) sandbox it or b) delete it.

Moving less-trusted loaders into a separate repo is a blame-the-user or blame-the-os-vendor move, depending 
on who installs them onto the system.

- Owen

----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Matthias Clasen < matthias clasen gmail com
> > wrote:
>
> > Before doing so, I want to ask if anybody is willing to step up and maintain
> > these loaders. Note that even if we drop these from gdk-pixbuf itself, they
> > can be maintained out-of-tree... one of the advantages of having loaders as
>  modules.
>
> Not stepping up to maintain those, but I really like Emmanuele's idea of
> splitting the other modules into a separate repository on git.gnome.org ; I
> think there is value in keeping them all in a central location.
>
> Cosimo
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list