Re: Spell checking in GIO

glib-networking exists for political reasons. I don't think we want to repeat that with something we can just import in-tree.

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com> wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:58 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
> enchant depends on glib, so yes, a hard dependency on it from glib would
> be a problem. But enchant development has more or less stopped (last
> commit was two years ago), and if glib had equivalent functionality then
> enchant would be pretty much unnecessary. So it might make more sense to
> just absorb it into glib (which Dom seemed in favor of in that bug anyway).

Or perhaps follow the "glib-networking" pattern where GIO just defines a
spell checking interface and an extension point and the meaty parts with
the extra dependencies are supplied by 3rd party module(s).

"glib-spell-checking" anyone?  :)

Matthew Barnes

gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list gnome org


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]