Re: Problems with un-owned objects passed to closures in pygobject (gtk_cell_renderer_text_start_editing)
- From: Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Problems with un-owned objects passed to closures in pygobject (gtk_cell_renderer_text_start_editing)
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:05:48 +0100
On 08.02.2013 04:08, Simon Feltman wrote:
I've created a ticket and proposed patch for GTK+:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693393
I am looking for feedback to see if this type of thing is even
acceptable and if it's worthy of further pursuit.
Won't gobject-introspection silently turn the (transfer full) annotation
into (transfer none) due to the special handling for GInitiallyUnonwed
descendants?
Also, the list in the bug is missing Gtk.CellRenderer.start_editing (the
vfunc, not the method).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]