Re: RFC: new features

[Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>]

On 12 January 2012 12:17, Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com> wrote:
> to me, this is highly unrealistic. undo/redo is incredibly application
> (and "scale") specific. even inside one application, it can make sense
> to find two entirely different approaches to handling undo/redo (e.g.
> one based on save/restore of the full state of objects and other based
> on storing differences in state).

Tasks has a undo manager/undoable implementation and that's
implemented by function pointers that do the right thing, so you can
probably implement both methods with that.

(http://git.gnome.org/browse/tasks/tree/libkoto)

Ross