Re: Please don't drop support for Curve
- From: Danielle Madeley <danielle madeley collabora co uk>
- To: Charlie De <charliecoeli yahoo com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Please don't drop support for Curve
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 11:54:26 +1000
Thanks to GObject-Introspection you could copy the code from GtkCurve
into a small C library that is bundled with your program and generate
gobject-introspection bindings for it to use with PyGObject.
This would also allow you to grow GtkCurve into something that meets
your needs.
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 03:22 -0700, Charlie De wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I've joined up with this list for one single reason: to ask the developers to
> re-consider and reverse their decision to deprecate and eventually remove the
> Curve widget from GTK+.
>
> Recently, I learnt to create Python scripts, and with the help of Glade, created
> a GUI to ImageMagick routines, for my own "proprietary photo editor". The Curve
> widget was absolutely central to this endeavour. The only downside is that it is
> basic and not very well developed.
>
> To me, the reasons given for this widget being deprecated, that it isn't very
> useful and only appeals to a minority of users, sounds disingenuous and hurtful
> to the easy usefulness of GTK+. What do you expect users to do in its absence?
> Do you really expect users to go breaking their knuckles to try and create a
> curve dialog with a drawing area? How could you see such "progress" as anything
> but a step backwards?
>
> So please, hear a busy user who has taken the trouble of registering here to
> offer feedback: do not drop this essensial component of GTK+, and instead of
> deprecating it, continue its development. You can drop Gamma Curve if you like,
> which is too idiosyncratic to be of much use. What is needed instead is the
> Curve offering point data - the points on the curve that the user creates -
> being able to be read and manipulated by other widgets, such as the numerical
> scroll boxes. (Rather like the Curves dialog in Photoshop.) And I'm sure there
> are other improvements that could be made.
>
> If on the other hand you insist on dropping the Curve, then when the time comes
> I guess I'll have to switch to another widget toolset, whichever will still be
> offering a Curve interface element. I can't even begin to image how long it
> would take me to create the widget manually - it frankly strikes me as an insane
> and pointless effort.
>
> Thank you for your attention and best wishes with your continuing good work.
> What you have created in GTK+ (and pyGTK) is greatly appreciated and wonderfully
> useful.
>
> All the best,
>
> Charlie
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
--
Danielle Madeley
Software Developer, Collabora Ltd. Melbourne, Australia
www.collabora.co.uk
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]