Re: [g-a-devel] Coming to grips with the state of a11y in gtk

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com> wrote:

> 1 of 4 is failing. Could you elaborate why this theorical points have
> "failed miserably"?

In my view, keeping the a11y implementation in their separate module
ghetto is a failure in terms of maintenance, performance, and
robustness. We just don't have a marvellously working accessible

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]