Re: pixbuf<->cairo_surface_t conversion

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Soeren Sandmann <sandmann daimi au dk> wrote:

> Not that it matters that much, but if you use cairo_mask() with the
> pixbuf data as both source and mask, the source as RGB24 and the mask
> as ARGB32, you could make cairo do the conversion from pixbuf to
> surface. That would likely hit an SSE2 or ARM NEON optimized code path
> in pixman.

Interesting. But how would that deal with the fixed-endianness of
pixbuf data vs the native endianness of cairo ?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]