Re: pixbuf<->cairo_surface_t conversion

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Havoc Pennington <hp pobox com> wrote:
> Hi,

> Am I missing a big downside?

One downside that you've mentioned earlier is that with this approach,
gdk-pixbuf grows a cairo (and thus libX11) dependency.
That might inconvenience a few gdk-pixbuf users. But the one I know
offhand, librsvg, already has a cairo dependency (via pango) anyway.
So, probably not a big problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]