Re: Next major glib version number [was: threading / timers / etc]

["Daniel Macks" <dmacks netspace org>]

On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:20:45  0200, Ryan Lortie  wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 16:14  0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
 > > glib 3.0 maybe? We're still discussing changes for glib 2.x, aren't we?
 >
 > If you accept the following premises:
 >
 >   - we can't break glib API without effectively also breaking Gtk API
 
*phew*
 
>   - we aren't going to bump glib's version number when we release Gtk3
 
X constant for Y=3
 
>   - we like glib to have the same version as Gtk in the long-run
 
X=Y
 
> then it becomes clear that we need to skip GLib 3.0.
 
Assertion failed: (X!=3)
 
dan
 
 
--
Daniel Macks
 dmacks netspace org