Re: Gtk-OSX (was: Website proposal for usability)
- From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu>
- To: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gtk-OSX (was: Website proposal for usability)
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:14:13 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell wfu edu> wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
> >
> >> For a GTK+ runtime package ("GTK+ Framework"), I think you should
> >> check out what has been done in the past. It is by no means an easy
> >> task. The latest code and instructions for this are at the GTK-OSX
> >> website if I am not mistaken.
> >
> > I'm aware it's not an easy task. That's why I'm requesting that
> > such a runtime package be made available as a download via gtk.org
> > (and offering to help in building one to the extent I'm able).
>
> its been explained quite a few times before that applications that use
> GTK and ship a bundle for OS X will almost certainly include GTK
> *inside* the bundle. providing standalone GTK frameworks is almost
> useless for users.
It has certainly been explained that that is the situation on
Windows, and I fully accept it. It's less clear that it should be
the situation on OS X, with its *nix-type substructure.
But even if we suppose that the best way to distribute a GTK app
for OS X is with GTK bundled internally, I don't think that
invalidates the idea that it would be very useful for app
developers to have a GTK runtime package available, as we do for
Windows. As things stand, rolling your own GTK for OS X is a
significant hurdle, and one that doesn't really have to be there.
Allin Cottrell
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]