Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
- From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- To: Daniel Macks <dmacks netspace org>
- Cc: "gtk-devel-list gnome org" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:50:34 -0400
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Daniel Macks <dmacks netspace org> wrote:
> (drifting slightly off topic into another pet peeve...) .la files are a
> crutch that makes it easy for developers to avoid remembering to link
> against libraries that they actually use.
alas, they are not even really that. they are a band-aid for a handful
of platforms (mostly old Unix-ish systems) that don't store dynamic
dependencies properly, and so require a band-aid to get dynamic
linking to work correctly. on a sensible platform, there is nothing in
a .la file that serves any useful purpose whatsoever.
more generally: waf FTW! :)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]