Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]

From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
To: Havoc Pennington <hp pobox com>
Cc: "gtk-devel-list gnome org" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:08:19 -0400

On 08/04/10 16:33, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> I have a personal project where I'm not using convenience libraries
> for files that are part of a half-dozen executables because it's
> faster to compile files 6 times than it is to use a libtool library.

Are you exaggerating for effect or is this really the case?  I have a hard
time believing that libtool (2.x) performance is *that* bad.  And I only hack
on libraries...

behdad

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
  - From: Havoc Pennington

References:
- Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
  - From: =?utf-8?b?RGFuaWVsIE1hY2tz?=
- Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
  - From: Havoc Pennington

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]