Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
- From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp pobox com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: AC_MSG_RESULT(patching libtool to fix HIDEOUS BREAKAGE) [was Re:dconf 0.5]
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:46:45 +0200
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:33 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
> Given this I'm not sure why nobody has ever replaced libtool while
> keeping automake. For me it's probably 1) automake is written in perl
> which I just don't speak and 2) suspicion that automake upstream
> wouldn't take the patch. I am completely happy with automake
> (especially when used nonrecursively). But libtool is too
> anti-productivity to live. If automake could just build a frickin'
> shared library instead of .la-hell, it would be a big upgrade.
>
> Or if someone could fix libtool so it isn't slow, and doesn't create
> annoying .la files on platforms that don't require them, that would be
> great too.
What about http://dolt.freedesktop.org/ ? The approach taken here sounds
quite reasonable and has the potential to cut down compile time
significantly while keeping the portability of libtool without having to
reimplement it.
Sven
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]