Re: GObject Introspection support for GSList or other types without a GLib type
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, anjuta-list lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: GObject Introspection support for GSList or other types without a GLib type
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:38:14 -0400
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 19:33 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> That's true, but is there any data type check when g_object_set/get
> function is called?
>
> If GLib plans to use G_TYPE_POINTER for GSList, GError, gshort, and
> any other data type without G_TYPE* macro defined, then just tell it
> on the documentation: "if you (programer) want to use a not defined
> type use G_TYPE_POINTER on properties declaration".
>
> If documented or the better practice is stablished, some projects like
> Anjuta doesn't need to define a G_TYPE_ERROR from him self.
You are misunderstanding my comment.
I'm talking in *particular* about GSList. Well and GList, GHashTable and
other container types.
Without parameterized types (a list of what?) G_TYPE_SLIST is useless.
- Owen
> 2009/6/17 Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 02:30 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> > How to handle data types without a GLib GType defined.
> >
> > On libgda, it define a GType for GError and a GSList becouse
> these
> > doesn't exist on GLib and it uses them as parameters when
> creating
> > properties and events.
> >
> > For now may be the library (as Anjuta does) must create its
> own GType
> > definition but with the following rule: the name of the type
> must be
> > defined as "GError" and "GSList", in order to allow
> g-ri-scanner to
> > detects the currect types GError and GSList as the example.
> >
> > In GDA it has GDA_TYPE_ERROR and GDA_TYPE_SLIST with
> "GdaError" and
> > "GdaSList", then the scanner tries to find a definition to
> GdaError
> > and GdaSList but they don't exist, when changed this types'
> names as
> > avobe the correct type is detected.
>
>
> To point out what may be obvious - there is zero advantage of
> a
> <X>_TYPE_SLIST over G_TYPE_POINTER.
>
> This is true in general, and true for gobject-introspection -
> if
> gobject-introspection finds a property by introspection and
> deduces a
> type of GSList for it, it still doesn't have the element-type.
>
> - Owen
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
> "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los
> cuates: LIBRE)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]