Re: GLib plans for the next cycle

[Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>]

Gustavo Noronha wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 01:07 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > - What do we do about the added 16bit integer types that are supported
> > by the DBus protocol, but don't have corresponding fundamental types in
> > GObject ? EggDbus currently has fundamental types for them.
>
> It just stroke me. What about int32? Should it be added for completeness
> sake, or it is a non-issue?

On every platform on which glib currently runs "int" is exactly 32 bits 
in size.

Maybe we get in trouble in some distant future time when we decide to 
port to some exotic new platform, but for now it's not a problem.