Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:35 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> 26 mar 2008 kl. 11.10 skrev Murray Cumming:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> >> 25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
> >> but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
> >> bindings include (and require) a wider set of library bindings than  
> >> GTK
> >> + bindings.
> >
> > You're saying it's a disadvantage that bindings for other libraries  
> > are
> > available too.
> 
> No, I'm saying that the fact that a binding doesn't include certain  
> GNOME libraries or follow GNOME release schedule shouldn't move it to  
> some secondary citizen table for GTK+ which is used widely outside of  
> GNOME.
> 
> For example the C# bindings are not on the GNOME bindings page,

Yes, they are.

>  even  
> though it is one of the most used and high quality bindings for GTK+.
> 
> Best Regards,
>    Mikael Hallendal

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com