On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:39:33 -0500 Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 19:15 +0200, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: > > I thought that GObject was meant as a general-purpose object system > > for C, rather than as a GTK+-specific utility library. I suppose I > > misunderstood. > > I fail to see how any of this discussion should change your perception > of GObject. This is a discussion about GTK's usage of GObject, but your > own objects can continue to use it in whatever way makes the most sense > to you. Tim Janik argued that the bad performance of the property system is not an issue in GTK+. I pointed out that in my understanding, the GObject framework is supposed to be a client-agnostic object system. As such, its performance issues should matter to the GLib maintainers, regardless of how much they affect GTK+. -- Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort brutele be>
Attachment:
pgpTOBIDfchSn.pgp
Description: PGP signature