Re: Proposal for a collection API in glib

["Felipe Contreras" <felipe contreras gmail com>]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 13:37 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>> Why explore alternate ideas? Some downsides to GIterator-as-gobject:
>>
>> * GObject is pretty heavyweight for something like this, and moreover
>> right now libglib doesn't depend on libgobject
>
> Agree with this. Perhaps a more lightweight GType could be used for the
> iterator type. Isn't GStreamer for example providing lightweight GObject
> like GTypes?

Indeed:
http://www.koders.com/c/fid658F8E1DB8DB0E76D6B2E27AD4370F1BE87CAC46.aspx?s=gst_mini_object_new#L146

-- 
Felipe Contreras