Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft

[Frederic Peters <fpeters 0d be>]

Murray Cumming wrote:

> > what is most unfortunate is that library.g.o only has glib development
> > docs, but not gtk development docs.
> 
> That's probably because there are no tarball releases of GTK+ from svn
> trunk at the moment. library.gnome.org can only use tarballs, I believe.

That is the main issue; the other one would be this version wouldn't
be in any GNOME module set as published by the release team but this
is easy to work around.


        Frederic