Re: RFC: Deprecate GTK_{RESPONSE,STOCK}_{YES,NO}
- From: "Morten Welinder" <mwelinder gmail com>
- To: "Mathias Hasselmann" <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: RFC: Deprecate GTK_{RESPONSE,STOCK}_{YES,NO}
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:23:07 -0400
2008/8/25 Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>:
> Hi,
>
> The pure existence of GTK_RESPONSE_YES, GTK_RESPONSE_NO, GTK_STOCK_YES
> and GTK_STOCK_NO encourages creation of horrible user interfaces.
What a terrible idea!
First, GTK_RESPONSE_YES and GTK_RESPONSE_NO do not imply
much about user interfaces, good or bad. They are response codes,
nothing else, and can be paired with any GTK_STOCK_* in full
observance of the HIG.
Second, for GTK_STOCK_YES and GTK_STOCK_NO, do you really
want to break a pile of GTK applications just because they run afoul
of a related project's (i.e., Gnome's) guide lines? Note: guide lines
are not strict rules.
(For the record, I seem to have lots of _RESPONSE_ lying around,
but no _STOCK_ ones. Unless they are somehow hidden in glade
files.)
Morten
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]