Re: GtkBuilder status
- From: Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>
- To: Yevgen Muntyan <muntyan tamu edu>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkBuilder status
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:23:58 -0300
>>> Over the last couple of weeks Henrique Romano and I have been working on
>>> GtkBuilder, a UI constructor intended for inclusion in GTK+.
>>> I'd like to discuss the API and some of the decisions before making the
>>> code available for public review.
>>>
>>
>> I went ahead and attached the patch to
>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172535
>
> Why remove custom properties? They are still needed by applications,
> since an application
> can't extend parser nor can it override existing Bulidable interface (i
> guess it is possible, but
> in the same way as it's possible to add/override properties in existin
> class).
Applications should probably not alter interfaces on types owned by gtk,
however it is possible to reimplement the interface for any custom types.
Custom properties is really a hack, I'm not saying they aren't useful,
just that I'd like to avoid supporting them if possible.
You could convince me by providing a couple of good use cases where
using custom properties is appropriate.
Johan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]