Re: warning about invalid tree model iterators

[Tim Janik <timj imendio com>]

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Kristian Rietveld wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:22:13PM +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
> > disabling G_GNUC_WARN_UNUSED_RESULT globally is not what anyone of us had
> > in mind i think. i agree with you that the patch should simply be backed
> > out where it generates too many warnings.
> >
> > did you, or anyone else for that matter, investigate yet whether it'd be
> > worth
> > keeping the warnings for *some* of the functions?
>
> I didn't have a really strong opinion when this first came up, but
> meanwhile I made up my mind.  I think it's better to back the change out
> for all functions.  Looking at the list of functions again, I don't see
> any function which would benefit from complaining about unused return
> values in all cases.  For all of them there are cases where the warning
> makes sense and cases where the warning does not make sense.

thanks for the commentary kris. i've backed out the warnings in CVS now.

> regards,
>
> -kris.

---
ciaoTJ