Re: using literal zero for NULL
- From: mikecorn <mikecorn t-online de>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: using literal zero for NULL
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:09:07 -0800 (PST)
I see your point about the arg-list-end flag.
It seems it should be OK to use a zero in place of NULL when the argument is
of a type known to the compiler and NULL is a documented way to denote a
missing argument (e.g. optional window title string). Agree?
Thanks for the response.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/using-literal-zero-for-NULL-t1316047.html#a3510632
Sent from the Gtk+ - Dev - General forum at Nabble.com.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]